Why Kodi Boxes can pose a Serious Malware Threat
July 13, 2017
Raina Zakir (82 articles)
Share

Why Kodi Boxes can pose a Serious Malware Threat

When new streaming devices, such as the Amazon Firestick and Apple TV, were first introduced, many were intrigued by the ease by which they could watch “over the top” content from the Internet, such as Netflix or Hulu, on their living room televisions.

Since then, there has been a proliferation of other devices – many with an open-source media player known as Kodi, which enables viewers to watch a wide range of movies and television shows from illegal sources through software add-ons. These devices are now generally identified as illicit streaming devices (ISDs) or nicknamed “Kodi boxes.” They are often sold “pre-loaded” with add-on apps that provide the access to large-scale pirate sites and enable a user to easily stream live channels and on demand material from content theft websites.

But consumers need to be aware that these customized devices with add-ons for watching pirated content are as illegal as large-scale piracy sites. Kodi is working to distance itself from content thieves, discouraging piracy add-ons and praising Facebook for new policies prohibiting selling pre-loaded boxes that offer pirated content. Similarly, Amazon and eBay have banned sales of ISDs.

Serious security issues

But many of these devices also have serious security issues. Security experts have warned how hackers can exploit these devices to infect consumers’ computers and other devices. Recently, the security firm Check Point issued a warning that hackers were exploiting these devices to hack users.

Here’s how this particular vulnerability works: As part of streaming movies and television content, pre-loaded “Kodi boxes” allow the user to search for subtitles that may be downloaded when the user wants to watch a movie in a foreign language. Hackers have seized on this to create the vulnerability. By generating their own tampered language files and adding it to the un-curated directory of subtitle files, they are able to install malware on a user’s system making it accessible to the hacker.

The malware is unlikely to be discovered by the software because the file format of most caption files is typically viewed as non-threatening, and therefore, not analyzed as closely.

Missing patching mechanism

When news of this vulnerability became public, software makers updated the source code to prevent such vulnerabilities from happening via their own software. However, unlike devices manufactured by the major players, there is no mechanism by which to widely update the software in existing streaming devices. Also, many users may not be aware of the security update and therefore may be unaware of the vulnerability to their system.

The biggest challenge is that none of the players in the illicit streaming device ecosystem makes their users’ security or privacy a priority. Participants in this underground industry typically point fingers at each other and have not yet stepped up to protect the safety and security of the consumer. That is vastly different than established providers such as Verizon or Apple who have a vested interest in a user’s trust, and continued business.

The worry for consumers

And this is not the first security challenge for these devices. According to Android PC Review, in 2015 a security firm found that certain software was vulnerable to “man in the middle” attacks where a hacker seizes on a lack of security on how updates to software are handled to change code and install viruses onto a system.

The worry for consumers is they may not even realize that illicit streaming devices pre-loaded with pirated content, or those that stream pirated content, are illegal. And that, in part, is the problem: we have gotten used to trusting our devices because they were associated with well-known brands. Unfortunately, disreputable actors are exploiting that trust to offer devices that can harm unknowing consumers.

The future of content on pre-loaded or illicit streaming devices is uncertain. In recent weeks, several illegal add-ons have abruptly shut down. Given the security issues and add-on shutdowns, it’s clear that consumers who spent money on the devices may be getting malware along with their “free content” – not what they expected.

Key developments consumers should be aware of

Be careful from whom you make purchases. For years, Digital Citizens has warned consumers about making retail purchases from obscure online websites because they often don’t have the same guarantees as well-known retailers. But recently, a growing number of websites have added bells and whistles to make themselves look legitimate. Consumers should not be fooled by slick looking sites or deceptive marketing telling you these pre-loaded boxes are “legal.”

The add-ons market is in flux. Just last month, popular add-on providers and some popular add-ons shut down without notice. The exit of some vendors who purposely and accidently allowed for dangerous activity opens the door to others who want to jump in the market. The illegal streaming market is ripe for opportunists looking to make a quick buck. While we’d say it’s always dangerous to engage in this activity, it is particularly dangerous now.

Law Enforcement is getting tough on those using Kodi illegally. Bad actors count on consumers being unaware of the dangers contained in some ISDs, but law enforcement agencies around the world are starting to focus on the problem. British authorities are aggressively going after individuals selling “fully-loaded” devices – or those that come “pre-loaded with third party plug-ins and add-ons that allow users to stream pirated content to their TV.”

Given the disperse nature of these devices and intended uses that are often unlawful, raising public awareness – both about specific vulnerabilities and the overall risks that occur when using unverified or untrusted devices or providers – is the first line of defense.

There are many organizations that can help raise awareness:

  • Consumer-focused groups should put out alerts to let their communities know about the risks from illicit streaming devices.
  • The Federal Trade Commission has both a wide reach and a wide range of tools to let consumers know about the threat and risks.
  • State attorneys general, who often serve as the consumer protection function within their states, can play an important role in educating their citizens.

Hackers and bad actors rely on consumer confusion and lack of knowledge to be successful. That is why all those who care about protecting consumers must play a leading role in giving them their best defense: knowledge about online risks so they can steer clear.

Source | HelpNet Security